The Hivert–Thiéry conjecture
and differential normal forms
Caius Folkerts
Abstract. We prove the Hivert–Thiéry coinvariant conjecture by showing
that, throughout its proposed parameter range, the deformed quotient is the
ordinary coinvariant algebra as a graded symmetric-group module. The Artin
monomials form a basis, with a sharp parameter range for . The proof combines
deformed Koszul relations with a coordinate filtration that applies to weighted
tails over arbitrary fields. The same Koszul mechanism gives normal forms
for flat lower-order differential perturbations of a regular sequence, allowing
noncommutative coefficients. For weighted homogeneous Jacobian systems with
isolated singularities, an Euler identity and the Brieskorn module determine both
the resonant parameters and the graded defect at each of them.
In 2004, Hivert and Thiéry introduced a differential deformation of the symmetric power
sums and conjectured that its coinvariants retain the graded -module structure of the
ordinary coinvariant algebra [1]. We prove this throughout their proposed parameter range
and determine exactly when the classical Artin monomials span the deformed
quotient.
Let , let , and put
Here and throughout, a sum of operator images is a vector-space sum. Let be the
elementary symmetric polynomials and define
Theorem 1.1.For , there is a graded -module isomorphism
The classes of the Artin monomials
form a basis. If , these monomials span the quotient only when .
The first assertion settles the conjecture, while the basis statement and its converse
identify the exact range of the Artin normal forms for every . Dotsenko [4, Theorem 25
and Remark 26] proved the graded-character assertion outside the larger exceptional set
obtained by dropping . The proof here obtains the full stated range and the monomial
basis together. Malyshev’s positive-weight simplex argument [3, Theorem 5 and
Section 3] is a precedent for the coordinate filtration.
The difficulty is that is a sum of operator images, rather than an ideal. We compare its
quotient with a complete intersection by two bounds; the first two Koszul maps deform
with the operators, and their zero composition, together with exactness at the undeformed
point, gives a lower bound for the quotient. For the upper bound, we separate monomials
of full support from those on coordinate hyperplanes. The former reduce the starting index
of the operator family, and the latter reduce the number of variables. The required
coefficients are invertible precisely under the stated nonresonance conditions. For , an
explicit harmonic polynomial gives the obstruction to the Artin span at each excluded
parameter.
This induction naturally includes unequal coefficients and every tail of the operator
family. Section 2 proves that weighted theorem over an arbitrary field before specializing
to Theorem 1.1. The deformed Koszul relations also assemble into a finite Lie–Rinehart
resolution. Over the universal parameter ring, it is a minimal linear free resolution in
each polynomial degree, so specialization and parameter shifts are controlled by
finite complexes (Section 3). The same coordinate decomposition survives for
monomial reflection groups and flat matrix residues; these forms are developed in
Section 4.
A complementary use of Koszul exactness treats differential perturbations that lower a
positive grading. Lifting the full complex preserves a homogeneous normal form. If form a
free Lie module of polynomial vector fields and is a regular sequence, every fixed
homogeneous complement to their ideal remains a complement after a flat lower-order
perturbation. The result permits noncommutative coefficient algebras and applies to free
arrangements; constant matrix curvature is handled by a quotient of the coefficient module
(Section 5).
In weighted homogeneous Jacobian systems, the differential and multiplication terms
have equal degree, so exceptional parameters can occur. For isolated singularities, an Euler
identity isolates the possible resonant degree, and the Brieskorn module measures its
defect exactly. Section 6 carries this out for hypersurfaces and complete intersections,
including graded symmetry representations.
We write , , and . Hilbert-series inequalities are coefficientwise. Multiplication by is
denoted by ; its position in a composition will matter.
2. Weighted power operators
The lower bound comes from a general observation about a polynomial family of
complexes. It will also be used for matrix coefficients.
Lemma 2.1.Let be finite-dimensional vector spaces over a field , and let
be polynomial families of linear maps in one or finitely many parameters. Suppose
identically. If at one parameter value , then
at every parameter value. The same assertion applies after taking multiplicity
spaces for a finite group whose order is invertible in , provided the maps are
equivariant.
Proof.Let be the ranks over the rational function field of the parameter space. A
minor nonzero at is a nonzero polynomial, so
Since , we have . Exactness at gives . Thus both inequalities are equalities.
Every minor of size greater than vanishes identically, proving the claim at every
specialization.
For such a finite group, the functor , for any representation , is exact. Applying
the preceding argument to these finite-dimensional multiplicity spaces proves the last
assertion. □
2.1. A general tail theorem.
Let be a field and put . For , , and , put
The original operators are . We work first with because the reversed order turns
the characteristic-polynomial recurrence into a relation among operator images.
For a nonempty subset , write . Fix an integer , and consider the condition
For every subgroup fixing , it is isomorphic as a graded -module to
where denotes the complete homogeneous symmetric polynomial. If all coincide, the
comparison may equivalently use the power sums . The same assertions hold with in place
of if additionally
Lower bound. Set . The characteristic polynomial gives symmetric homogeneous
polynomials , for and , with
The first identity is initialized by for , and extended by the monic recurrence of
length . The order of multiplication in the second identity is essential. In particular,
the first tail operators generate the joint image. Direct calculation also gives
Thus the usual Koszul relation between and has a controlled error; their
commutator is another tail operator. Expressing that operator in the first generators
supplies the correction below.
On the graded spaces
define
Then identically. At over , these are the first two Koszul maps for the weighted powers
, . This sequence is regular in every characteristic. At a common zero, group
the nonzero coordinate values as , with index blocks . The first equations give
The Vandermonde matrix is invertible, whereas every is a nonzero sum of
independent indeterminates. Thus the only common zero is the origin, proving
regularity.
Lemma 2.1 makes every larger polynomial minor vanish. Thus at every parameter
value over ,
□
Upper bound and basis. The induction separates monomials with full support from
those on a coordinate hyperplane. The first part lowers the tail index; the second
lowers the number of variables. To track nonresonance, put
Condition (2.1) is equivalent to for every nonempty and every integer . Write .
When , the identity
shows that is hit, since the last factor acts in degree by . Filter by the stable
subspaces
This filtration sorts boundary monomials by their largest zero index. Indeed, if ,
the map
is a vector-space isomorphism shifted in degree by . In that layer the -th operator
summand vanishes because it introduces a positive power of , placing the result in . For ,
the extracted factor adds one to the Euler operator. The remaining summands are
therefore the same operators in variables, with coefficients
Each surviving is unchanged or replaced by , so every new nonresonance scalar is an
old one with a larger nonnegative index. Taking a joint-image quotient is right
exact, so each layer contributes at most its lower-variable quotient. Summing the
degree shifts gives the upper bound , and the lifted lower-variable bases partition
.
For , the same characteristic identity gives
For , every index on the right of (2.5) is at least . Consequently the image of in is a
quotient of the degree-shifted space . This reduction leaves the shifted coefficients
unchanged, since
so the lower-tail nonresonance condition follows. The remaining quotient is
the tail quotient of . Its same boundary filtration has shifts (2.4), preserving
. Induction on , with the preceding case and the convention , therefore gives
For the spanning assertion, the monomials in with all exponents positive are . Those
with a zero coordinate partition according to the largest zero index, and are exactly the
lifts of the lower-variable bases through the boundary filtration. Thus spans, and equality
with the lower bound makes it a basis.
Finally, (2.3) and the singleton cases of make invertible. On every monomial, .
This diagonal map preserves the stated monomial span and is equivariant for
every permutation fixing . It transfers the basis and Hilbert series to the family.
□
Equivariance. The nonresonance hypothesis itself makes semisimple. In
characteristic , no value among the occurs times; choose equal coefficients and
an integer divisible by to contradict . The stabilizer of is therefore a product of
symmetric groups on fewer than letters, and its order is prime to .
Choose an independent coefficient for each -orbit, and repeat the lower-bound
argument on each -multiplicity space. Its weighted power sequence at is regular
by the same Vandermonde argument; each nonempty block sum is a nonzero linear
combination of the orbit coefficients. In characteristic , its coefficients are at most
the orbit sizes, all smaller than .
The comparison sequence is regular over every field. At a common zero, the
recurrence for complete homogeneous functions forces every later to vanish. Then
is a polynomial satisfying , so every . Its Koszul resolution and that of the generic
weighted powers have identical invariant generator degrees, and hence identical
graded -multiplicities. The specialized multiplicity lower bounds, together with the
proved dimension equality, give the comparison. This argument does not require to
split ; for a simple module , its multiplicity is .
If the coefficients all coincide, the characteristic is zero or greater than . The
ordinary power sequence is then regular too, since its Vandermonde block sums are
nonzero integers at most . Its Koszul resolution gives the same character. Finally,
the diagonal conjugation above transfers every assertion to the family. □
2.2. The Hivert–Thiéry quotient. For , , and , the nonresonance condition of
Theorem 2.2 is exactly . Thus its -quotient has the Artin basis and the graded character
of . The diagonal operator
is invertible in this range and satisfies
Indeed, on a monomial the coefficient is changed to . Since preserves each monomial
line and commutes with , this proves the sufficiency assertion of Theorem 1.1.
Over , for the scalar family , , the sufficient excluded parameters for the tail are
At this is exactly the original exceptional set; the second list is empty.
2.3. The exceptional parameters and the Artin basis. The obstruction is detected
on a subset of the variables; a harmonic copy of the standard representation occurs beyond
its usual coinvariant degrees.
Necessity in Theorem 1.1. When , the identity shows directly that the singleton
is a basis for every complex parameter.
Suppose now and . We may write with and ; if an initial representation has
numerator one, replace by . Setting commutes with every , and therefore induces
a surjection from the -variable quotient to the -variable quotient. It also maps the
Artin span onto the -variable Artin span, so it is enough to show that the latter does
not span.
Use the Fischer bilinear pairing
The adjoint of the original operator on variables is
Its common kernel is the graded dual of the hit quotient.
Put and . The harmonic vector was found by D’Adderio and Moci [2, Theorem 6.3].
Its resonance is visible in the following one-variable calculation. For every univariate
polynomial , Leibniz’s rule gives
Indeed, and . For , homogeneity reduces the right side to for every .
The -orbit of spans a copy of the standard representation in degree . The classical
coinvariant ring contains that representation only in degrees , once in each. Here is a short
justification of this familiar fact. The permutation representation is the sum of the trivial
and standard representations, and its multiplicity space in is . Exactness of invariants and
the elementary-symmetric relations give
where is elementary symmetric in the first variables. Indeed successively gives ,
followed by . The trivial multiplicity space is , leaving standard multiplicity series
.
The comparison of all other multiplicities does not assume the desired conclusion at
this exceptional parameter. In each degree, the original hit matrix has polynomial
entries in . The already proved theorem at nonexceptional parameters identifies
its generic graded character with . A specialization can only decrease matrix
rank, also on every irreducible multiplicity space. Thus every multiplicity in
the harmonic kernel is at least its generic value. Since , the standard copy just
constructed is additional. Consequently, in degree , the harmonic kernel has
dimension strictly greater than , the number of degree- Artin monomials in
variables.
The degree- quotient therefore has larger dimension than the Artin span. The -variable
Artin classes do not span, and coordinate restriction gives the same conclusion in
variables. □
Remark 2.3.For and , the polynomial is harmonic and annihilates every standard
Artin monomial in five variables; its degree is four, while an Artin monomial
supported on the first three variables has degree at most three. The Artin classes
therefore do not span. D’Adderio and Moci [2] predict the usual graded coinvariant
character at this parameter.
2.4. Arithmetic progressions of operator indices.
Restricting the indices to multiples of preserves each exponent class modulo .
On these residue blocks the operators are again weighted tails, which explains
both the enlarged monomial ranges and the appearance of monomial reflection
groups.
Corollary 2.4.Let , and retain only the operators with . Suppose
Their joint-image quotient has basis
and Hilbert series . Over , for equal coefficients it is isomorphic, as a graded
-module, to
The corresponding assertion holds if additionally for .
Proof.Decompose the polynomial space into its stable residue blocks
On the block indexed by , the operators are the tail operators in the variables
with coefficients and slope . For , their required scalar is
which is nonzero by hypothesis. Theorem 2.2 gives the block basis . The lifted
exponents give precisely the displayed basis and Hilbert series.
Over , the two-map comparison in the preceding proof works with indices ,
recurrence coefficients symmetric in , and the comparison sequence . This sequence is
regular by the same Vandermonde argument applied to . All maps are -equivariant,
so the lower bound on every multiplicity and the already established equality of
dimensions prove the assertion. The extra hypothesis for , together with the singleton
nonresonance condition for , again makes the diagonal conjugation invertible. □
When , this gives the ordinary coinvariant module.
2.5. Zero intercept and exact support decomposition.
When the multiplication intercept vanishes, the diagonal conjugation used above is no
longer invertible. Exact support provides a different decomposition; over , consider the
vector fields
Their coefficients vanish on monomials whose relevant exponent is zero, so they
preserve each exact-support summand
On the summand indexed by , multiplication by identifies their action with in
variables. All nonresonance conditions above are then automatic. Consequently
A basis is obtained by choosing and taking
including the constant for . For , the dimension is , and the full-support summand has
the usual shifted Artin basis.
2.6. Coefficient fields and equivariant families.
The coordinate reductions depend only on the displayed nonresonance scalars, so
they also describe which coefficient fields and parameter rings support the same
basis. Over a field of characteristic , the original Hivert–Thiéry conclusion holds
for and for every . For such a parameter all the pivots , , , are nonzero. Here
. For the arithmetic-progression representation statement one may use . The
corresponding monomial group acts when the field contains the needed roots of unity;
semisimplicity requires the characteristic not to divide the order of its diagonal
subgroup.
There is also a family-level strengthening in characteristic zero. Put
Define the operators and their joint image over . The coordinate filtration uses only
units of , so the Artin monomials span the universal quotient over . They are independent
over by the proved generic comparison. A relation over would lie in the kernel of a map
from a free module and become zero over the fraction field; this kernel is both torsion and
torsion free, hence zero. Thus the universal quotient is a free graded -module with the
Artin basis.
Moreover there is a single, noncanonical graded equivariant isomorphism
Indeed is a localization of the principal ideal domain , and each isotypic multiplicity
module is a finitely generated projective -module, hence free. Its rank is the classical
multiplicity. Choosing bases for these multiplicity modules gives the isomorphism, which
specializes at every .
3. Universal resolutions and differential forms
The dimension comparison used only the first two Koszul maps. Retaining the whole
complex explains how the quotients vary with their parameters and how they interact with
differential forms. We begin with the divergence identity that supplies the differential, then
use the coordinate calculation to control its specializations.
3.1. The divergence–Koszul construction. The first two Koszul maps can be
deformed whenever the vector fields form a Lie module and their multiplication terms
satisfy a cocycle identity. Divergence supplies the correction that makes the composition
zero. Let , with ordinary grading or positive integer weights, and let be a free graded
-module with homogeneous basis of positive degrees . Assume that is closed under
brackets. Write for divergence relative to . Suppose that a homogeneous -linear map of
degree zero satisfies
and that form a regular sequence. A closed logarithmic one-form restricted to is one
source of such a map, but the displayed algebraic hypotheses suffice.
For a parameter , define
The divergence identities imply
In particular, is independent of the chosen basis.
Theorem 3.1.Over , the quotient has the graded Hilbert series of the complete
intersection . At every complex specialization, each graded dimension is at least
its complete-intersection value. If a finite group acts linearly, preserves the grading
and , and makes equivariant, the same statements hold for each graded irreducible
multiplicity.
Proof.Set
Since , its image is . Define the -linear map by
It is well defined on the balanced exterior product, since replacing by , or by ,
gives in both cases
Both divergence and satisfy the Lie cocycle identity, so
At , these are the first two Koszul maps for the regular sequence . They are
exact at . In each fixed degree all spaces are finite dimensional and the matrices
depend polynomially on . Lemma 2.1 therefore gives the asserted generic equality and
specialized lower bounds. Linear changes of coordinates preserve divergence, since the
volume form changes by a constant. The maps are consequently equivariant under
the stated group hypotheses, and the same lemma applies to multiplicity spaces. □
For ordinary grading, the generic Hilbert series in this theorem is . For weights , the
denominator is . “Generic” here means over the rational function field, or degree by degree
after specialization; the theorem does not assert that a finite exceptional set controls all
degrees.
3.2. The universal parameter resolution. For the weighted power operators,
these maps extend to a free resolution over the ring of independent parameters.
Arbitrary specializations need not remain exact. At the nonresonant parameters
considered above, however, the sharp dimension formula implies local freeness
of the universal module, and therefore proves exactness after specialization as
well.
Let be any field, let , and set
Give the parameters standard degree one. Independently, grade in the -variables by
total degree. Define
Write for its homogeneous component of -degree , retaining the grading in the
parameters.
Theorem 3.2.Each has a minimal graded free resolution over , linear in the parameter
grading, whose term in homological degree is
Here a negative-degree polynomial space is zero. Consequently,
For a nonnegative integer , the last polynomial dimension is .
Proof.The Lie brackets determine the differential; exactness will follow by setting ,
where the complex becomes an ordinary Koszul complex. We first construct the Lie
module on which this reduction takes place. For , put
The coefficient determinant of is, up to sign,
a nonzero polynomial over every field. These vector fields are therefore a free
-basis of . The characteristic-polynomial recurrence expresses every , , in this basis.
Together with , this proves closure under brackets; closure for polynomial multiples
follows from the Leibniz rule.
For , define
The displayed quotients are polynomials, since every is divisible by . A direct
calculation gives . Divergence and the logarithmic one-forms satisfy the cocycle
identities
Consequently,
These formulas hold in every characteristic.
Scale the bracket and anchor of by , and give the right action . Equations (3.2) are
exactly the right-module compatibilities. Put , and use and for the products with the
indicated factors omitted. The associated Chevalley–Eilenberg differential, with first map ,
is
Here the symbols in the formula are arbitrary elements of , not necessarily the
consecutively indexed basis elements. The second identity in (3.2) and the bracket Leibniz
rule make this formula balanced over ; the first identity and Jacobi give . For
example, in degree two the composite is . Thus this is a well-defined complex of
-modules.
Give the basis vector -degree . The differential preserves this degree, and every
coefficient in its matrix is linear in . Taking -degree , and shifting parameter
degree in homological degree by , gives precisely the finite free modules (3.1) and
homogeneous differentials of degree zero. The characteristic-polynomial recurrence on
the right shows that the image of is the joint image of all tail operators, so
.
Modulo , the complex is the Koszul complex of
over . We verify that this is a regular sequence globally, not merely at generic
coefficients. Passing to an algebraic closure, stratify the common zero set according to the
zero coordinates and to the partition of the remaining coordinates into blocks having
distinct nonzero values . The first equations become
Vandermonde invertibility forces the independent linear conditions . Conversely,
these conditions imply all the equations on the stratum. Its -coordinates have
dimension , and its coefficient coordinates have dimension , so it has dimension
. There are only finitely many such strata, including the dimension- stratum
. The ideal therefore has height . Its homogeneous generators form a regular
sequence in the Cohen–Macaulay polynomial ring. Regularity descends from
the algebraic closure by faithful flatness. Notice that the block-sum constraints
have disjoint supports and coefficient one, so the argument is valid in arbitrary
characteristic.
It follows that is exact in every positive homological degree. Since each chain module is
free over , the short exact sequence of complexes
is valid. Its long exact homology sequence implies for every . These homology
modules are graded and bounded below. Multiplication by the positive-degree
parameter cannot be surjective on a nonzero such module; a nonzero element of least
homogeneous degree would have to come from a smaller degree. Hence all these
positive homology modules vanish. This proves that (3.1) is a free resolution of
.
Every differential entry lies in , the homogeneous maximal ideal. Thus the resolution is
minimal and has the stated linear Betti numbers. □
At any parameter point with residue field , the homology of the specialized complex is
Its degree-zero group is the specialized joint-image quotient, since cokernels commute
with tensor product. Exactness after specialization can therefore be read from the quotient
dimension.
Corollary 3.3.Fix a -degree , and let
At a parameter point , with residue field , the following conditions are equivalent
(i)
The specialized joint-image quotient has degree-dimension .
(ii)
is a free -module.
(iii)
.
(iv)
The specialized finite Lie–Rinehart complex is exact in every positive
homological degree.
In particular, if the specialized parameters satisfy
then the specialized finite Lie–Rinehart complex is exact in every positive homological
degree, in every -degree.
Proof.The generic rank of is ; tensor its free resolution with and take the
Euler characteristic. Indeed, the generating series of the alternating ranks is . This
argument is valid in every characteristic. Write and . This is a finitely generated
module of rank over the local domain .
If , choose lifts of a basis of this fiber. Nakayama’s lemma gives a surjection . Its
kernel has rank zero, because the source and target have equal rank. As a submodule
of a free module over a domain, that kernel is torsion-free, so it must be zero. Thus
is free. This argument also covers . Conversely, a free localization necessarily has
rank , giving the stated fiber dimension. This proves the equivalence of (i) and (ii).
A free localization has no positive Tor. Conversely, tensor a minimal presentation
with . If , minimality gives , and Nakayama gives . This proves (ii)(iii); the free
resolution identifies these conditions with (iv). Under nonresonance, Theorem 2.2
gives the fiber dimension , and hence all four conditions in every degree. □
3.3. Differential-form quotients.
The diagonal conjugation used in Theorem 1.1 also applies to Lie derivatives on
differential forms. Write
Assign polynomial degree zero to each , and let permute the variables and their
differentials. On this space set
Here denotes the usual Lie derivative.
Theorem 3.4.For every and every ,
as graded -modules, with placed in polynomial degree zero.
The integrable differential
preserves the hit subspaces and makes their quotient into an acyclic complex. An
-equivariant contracting homotopy is induced by
where contracts the exterior generator .
Proof.For an ordered subset , write . Since , the operator on the coefficient of is
Define the diagonal operator on this sector by
All its eigenvalues are nonzero at the stated parameters. If , conjugation changes
into ; if , the operator already has the latter form. Hence the direct sum is graded
and -equivariant, and
on every exterior degree. The scalar theorem proves the module isomorphism.
The operators commute, so . Moreover,
Indeed, adding to removes the factor from , exactly canceling the coefficient
in the differential. The transformed differential commutes with every , and therefore
descends to the quotient. The exterior complex with differential has contracting
homotopy . Conjugating back gives the displayed , which also commutes with the hit
operators. Thus on the quotient. □
There is a parallel statement for ordinary polynomial forms . Give degree one and use
the same formula .
Theorem 3.5.For every ,
as graded -modules, with the exterior factor placed in degree .
Proof.Now . On the sector, conjugation by the same therefore gives the weighted
scalar family
For every nonempty and every integer , its nonresonance scalar is
which is nonzero because . The weighted scalar theorem thus identifies this sector
quotient with , restricted to its stabilizer .
The exterior generator contributes the sign representation of and degree .
Inducing over all -element subsets gives
with the asserted degree shift. □
3.4. Parameter shifts and a finite Witt complex.
Multiplication by a variable shifts one coefficient of the weighted operators. These maps
form a Koszul complex, whose homology is computed by a finite truncation of the
positive Witt algebra. Fix . For a commutative -algebra and parameters , write
For , set . The identity
shows that multiplication by induces whenever . Define the chain complex
Give polynomial degree ; thus has degree zero. Commutativity of the multiplications
proves .
The parameter shift is exactly what makes this polynomial Koszul differential commute
with the operator resolution. The resulting double complex can be read in either direction;
resolving the operators gives , while resolving the coordinates sets and leaves only
the constant bracket coefficients. These coefficients form the following finite Lie
algebra.
Let be the graded complex Lie algebra with basis , , and brackets
It is the quotient of the Lie algebra with basis , , by the ideal spanned by , . Write for
its Chevalley–Eilenberg differential with trivial coefficients, using the sign convention
In particular .
Theorem 3.6.Assume that every scalar
is a unit of . There is a natural zigzag of graded quasi-isomorphisms
It commutes with all coordinate permutations preserving the parameters. The induced
action on the finite Lie algebra is trivial.
With the independent universal parameters , the same quasi-isomorphism holds over before any localization. The unit condition (3.6) ensures that it continues to hold for the
ordinary quotient complex after arbitrary specialization of parameters.
Proof.Let , and let be the free -module with basis
For independent parameters this is the Lie–Rinehart module used in Theorem 3.2.
The operator for weights is
For , it is . We use the right action and differential of (3.3). Every has divisible by ,
and
Thus the ordinary polynomial Koszul complex
is a complex of right Lie–Rinehart modules when the sector has weights . The
differential is -linear.
Set
Use the Koszul differential in the -direction and the finite Lie–Rinehart differential in
the -direction, with the usual total-complex sign. Equation (3.8) makes these differentials
commute before the total sign is inserted. Give the exterior generator degree . The total
polynomial degree is therefore the coefficient degree plus plus the sum of the exterior
indices ; both differentials preserve it.
First work over . For a fixed , its -complex is the universal free resolution from
Theorem 3.2, after the polynomial automorphism . It is exact in positive , with
degree-zero homology . The augmentation to that quotient gives the left arrow in
(3.7); it is zero for , and for it sends each polynomial coefficient to its class in
. The bounded double-complex spectral sequence proves that this arrow is a
quasi-isomorphism.
For the other direction, fix . Since is free over , the -complex is the polynomial
Koszul resolution of its fiber at . Its only homology is in degree , where it equals
The second augmentation is zero for , and for evaluates the coefficient at . The action
terms in its induced differential vanish; for every polynomial , since . Only constant
bracket coefficients survive. Since , these are precisely (3.5) when the sum lies in the basis
range. If , its expression in that range has coefficients of positive degrees , which vanish at
the origin. The induced differential is consequently . This proves the right-hand
quasi-isomorphism over .
Now localize by all the scalars in (3.6). The shifted sectors have the same nonresonance
property, since
The coordinate reductions in Theorem 2.2 use only the inverted scalars, and the
resulting Artin classes are independent over the fraction field. Thus each homogeneous
quotient is free over this localization. Its augmented Lie–Rinehart resolution is split exact,
and remains so after every base change to satisfying (3.6). The polynomial Koszul
resolution also survives every such base change. The same two augmentations prove (3.7)
over .
All constructions commute with coordinate permutations. Each is itself invariant under
those permutations, so the action on its fiber class is trivial. □
The homology of the finite model gives an exact universal torsion description. Put
and set . All of these spaces retain their polynomial grading. Choosing homogeneous
complements to cycles and boundaries gives, for any in Theorem 3.6,
The decomposition is not canonical, but its summands and gradings are specified.
Indeed, in the chosen decomposition the only nonzero blocks of identify a complement to
the cycles in degree with ; multiplying these blocks by gives (3.9) directly. For
the universal polynomial ring, or its nonresonance localization, is a nonzero
divisor, so the last summand is absent. The entire torsion is killed by one power of
.
Over , at the homology is the full exterior space , whereas at any it is . The first
homology is completely explicit
where the span is zero if the lower limit exceeds the upper. For the reverse inclusion one
uses . Thus, at a nonzero parameter,
Over the universal ring, its free summands have these same degrees, and it has one
-torsion summand in each degree .
For the original one-parameter problem take , , and . On the polynomial-form hit
quotients of Theorem 3.5, the cube differential becomes
This follows by conjugating (3.4) with the sectorwise operators used there. It has total
polynomial degree zero, its square is zero, and it descends to the hit quotients. For every
its complex is quasi-isomorphic to . In particular, all its homology carries the trivial
-action. At it recovers the exterior classes in degrees ; at every allowed , its first
homology has one class in each of degrees when , and only the degree- class when
.
Corollary 3.7 (Stable pentagonal degrees).For the original
polynomial-form complex (3.10), let and . For every homological degree and every
polynomial degree ,
Every nonzero group in this formula is the trivial -module.
Proof.In total polynomial degree , every exterior basis index and every bracket
output is at most . The complex of is therefore exactly the degree- part of
the Chevalley–Eilenberg complex of the infinite positive Witt algebra, with basis
, . Goncharova’s theorem gives its positive-degree homology in precisely the two
displayed weights [9]; see also [10, Theorem 1.4] for the stated grading convention.
Cohomology and homology have identical dimensions in each fixed weight, since their
finite-dimensional complexes are dual. The result now follows from Theorem 3.6. □
4. Monomial reflection groups and residues
We return to the coordinate filtration. Arithmetic progressions gave the quotients; the
product invariant of requires a thicker coordinate boundary. Let be a field, put , and fix
and . Over , the group consists of monomial matrices whose nonzero entries are -th roots
of unity and whose product of nonzero entries has -th power one. Set , retain the operators
, , and add
Theorem 4.1.Suppose
where is integral. Then the quotient by the joint images of , , and has Hilbert series
A basis is the disjoint union, over , of the monomials with
Over , for equal coefficients, the quotient is the graded coinvariant module.
Over , the same conclusions hold for together with
if the proper-subset condition above holds and, in addition,
Proof.For the lower bound in the case, use the free module of derivations with basis
Its coefficient determinant is, up to sign, , hence is nonzero. It is closed under
brackets. Besides the Witt brackets, one has
The characteristic identity, with evaluated in , gives
It expresses , and then every higher , in this basis.
Use the cocycle and operators from the preceding universal construction,
They give and . Right balance and the commutator identity give the first two
Koszul deformation maps exactly as before. Over the field of independent coefficients
, the comparison sequence at is
It is regular; at a common zero, , and the remaining at most distinct nonzero
values among are ruled out by the Vandermonde argument, since every nonempty
block sum of the independent coefficients is nonzero. The rank lemma identifies
the generic quotient dimension with the complete-intersection value. Specialization
cannot increase matrix rank, so this is a lower bound at every parameter. For equal
coefficients over , apply the same argument at , on each multiplicity space. Its
comparison sequence is .
For the upper bound, the image of is exactly , because on a monomial of degree
its scalar coefficient is . Filter by
The -th layer is the direct sum of copies, shifted by , , of the -variable
arithmetic-progression module, with coefficients for and for . The omitted term
raises the -th exponent by at least and vanishes in the layer. The proper-subset
hypotheses ensure nonresonance on all these layers. Thus right exactness gives
The lifted bases are precisely the displayed disjoint union. The lower bound makes
them independent and proves the character statement.
Over , the invariant ring of is
Indeed invariance under its diagonal subgroup gives ; taking symmetric invariants
and using gives the displayed ring. Newton’s identities identify its positive-generator
ideal with the comparison ideal used above.
Finally, under the hypotheses for , both and equal . The invertible diagonal
map preserves this monomial ideal and conjugates every to . It therefore identifies
the two quotients, and preserves each monomial line and the group action in the
equal-coefficient case. This proves all assertions. □
Corollary 4.2.Over , let be the universal quotient by , , and . Put
The entries are indexed degrees and may repeat. For each -degree , has a minimal
linear free resolution over with term
in homological degree . At every parameter point satisfying the nonvanishing
assumptions of Theorem 4.1, this finite Lie–Rinehart complex remains exact in all
positive homological degrees after specialization.
Proof.The derivation basis, bracket formulas, and cocycle in the preceding proof are
valid in every characteristic. Its determinant is still a nonzero polynomial. At , the
comparison sequence over is now
This sequence is globally regular in arbitrary characteristic. To see this, pass to an
algebraic closure and stratify by zero coordinates and by the distinct nonzero values
of . If , their number is at most ; the first power-sum equations force the disjoint
block sums of the coefficients to be zero. If , the last equation gives , supplying the
zeroth power-sum equation. Together with the first other equations, this again forces
all block sums to be zero by Vandermonde invertibility. In either case there are
independent coefficient constraints, while the -stratum has dimension . The latter
statement remains valid when the characteristic divides , since the power map is
finite even when inseparable. Each stratum therefore has dimension . The common
zero set has dimension , so the generators have height and form a regular sequence.
The proof of Theorem 3.2 now applies without change; the complex modulo
is this Koszul complex, and positive-degree universal homology vanishes by graded
Nakayama. All matrix entries are linear in the parameters, giving the stated minimal
resolution. Its generic rank in degree is the coefficient of .
At every nonresonant point, Theorem 4.1 gives this same fiber dimension. The
local-freeness argument of Corollary 3.3 then gives exactness of the specialized
complex. □
4.1. Flat braid residues.
The coordinate flag also respects the fusion of logarithmic residues that occurs when a
coordinate is deleted. This allows noncommuting residues along the braid hyperplanes,
provided their flatness relations survive the fusion. Multiplication and differentiation
still have the same degree here; Section 5 will treat differential terms of lower
degree.
Let be a finite-dimensional complex vector space. Assign matrices to the edges of the
complete graph on . Assume the relations
Write , , and let . On , define
The displayed divided difference is a polynomial. For a nonempty , put
Theorem 4.3.Suppose that
Then the classes of
where ranges through any basis of , form a basis of
Its Hilbert series is .
If a finite group acts on and satisfies
the quotient is isomorphic as a graded -module to , with diagonal action.
Proof.We first verify the operator identities used for the lower bound. The
matrix-valued logarithmic form
is closed and flat. Indeed, (4.1) are the rank-two residue relations for the
hyperplanes and , and subtracting the central matrices does not change them. The
rank-two curvature calculation in Section 5.2 proves flatness directly. For the free
Lie module with basis , , set
Then , and
In particular, the characteristic-polynomial recurrence reduces all to the joint
images of , and the same two-map syzygy construction as in the main proof
applies.
For an unconditional lower bound, introduce a scalar and replace the parameters by
All commutators in (4.1) are multiplied by , so the relations persist. At , the first two
maps are the power-sum Koszul maps tensored with . The polynomial two-map rank
lemma gives the classical lower bound in every degree at every , hence at the desired . For
a symmetry group , this entire path is equivariant, so the lower bound also holds for each
irreducible multiplicity.
For the upper bound, write . In addition to the scalar characteristic identity, we have
To see this, the characteristic identity gives ; subtract its version for and divide by .
Consequently,
In polynomial degree , the last factor is invertible by (4.2), so lies in the hit
subspace.
Use the same coordinate-ideal flag on as in the main proof. On the layer whose largest
zero coordinate is , remove , divide out , and shift degree by . The new residues are
Here gives the fusion term ; the derivative of the divided-out monomial gives the scalar
-shift.
The relations survive this fusion. Ignoring the central shifts, replace the vertex by the
block ; . For example, the new triangle relation expands as
The first two terms are old triangle relations and the last two are disjoint-edge
relations. All other new triangle and disjoint-edge relations follow in the same way, or are
unchanged. Adding the central shifts in (4.4) preserves them.
For every nonempty remaining subset , its new matrix is
Thus (4.2) is inherited by every layer. Induction on the number of variables,
using right exactness of the joint-image quotient, gives the coefficientwise bound
The same induction gives precisely the Artin monomial lifts. The lower bound proves
equality and their independence. Equality of total dimensions together with the irreducible
lower bounds proves the equivariant assertion. □
There is also a tail version. If only are used, replace (4.2) by invertibility of for . Then
the quotient has the basis (2.2) tensored with , and
For a symmetry group , the comparison is as a graded -module. Indeed, fusion and the
coordinate flag are unchanged. The interior recursion uses
which follow from (4.3) and the characteristic relation of the vector fields. These are
exactly the two identities used in the tail induction of Theorem 2.2. The lower-bound path
now starts at the regular sequence .
4.1.1. Young-content parameters for symmetric-group residues.
Put , label the letters of by , and let be its irreducible complex representation indexed
by a partition . For a partition , write
For , take
These residues satisfy the required infinitesimal braid relations. Consequently the
preceding theorem has the following scalar form; if
for every , every partition of size , and every integer , then the classes of
form a basis of the joint-image quotient, and that quotient is isomorphic, as a graded
-module, to
Here fixes the letter and acts diagonally on the tensor product. For the tail
with , the same statement uses in (4.5), the basis , and the comparison module
.
Indeed, let have size , and let for a set of letters . Writing , the relevant matrix is
The sum of transpositions acts on a Specht representation by its content sum; iterated
branching to has precisely the constituents with , . The displayed scalars are
therefore exactly the eigenvalues of . This proves the assertion from the matrix
theorem.
For the standard representation , the expression inside braces has eigenvalue with
multiplicity , and eigenvalue with multiplicity ; a value with zero multiplicity is omitted.
To see this directly, on the permutation representation is the graph Laplacian of the
complete graph with the edges inside removed. Its constant eigenspace has eigenvalue
zero. On the sum-zero subspace, vectors supported on with coordinate sum zero have
eigenvalue , while their complementary -dimensional subspace has eigenvalue
.
4.2. Cyclotomic residues.
For the cyclotomic hyperplanes, coordinate deletion again fuses the incident
residues, but intermediate powers require a refinement of the coordinate flag. This
combines the two preceding constructions and includes the extra invariant of every
group . Let , let , and put . Let be a finite-dimensional complex vector space.
Choose matrices and , where and , such that the rational matrix-valued one-form
is flat. Equivalently, one may impose the rank-two residue relations (5.8) for this
arrangement. The subtraction of central from the coordinate residues does not affect
flatness. For , define
All the divided differences are polynomials. For a nonempty , set
Theorem 4.4.Assume that the matrices
are invertible for every nonempty proper and every integer , and that is invertible
for every integer . Then the joint-image quotient of by all operators in (4.6) and by
has Hilbert series
A basis is the monomial basis in Theorem 4.1tensored with any basis of . If acts
on and the residues transform covariantly with their hyperplanes, the quotient is as
a graded representation, with the diagonal action.
Proof.For a logarithmic vector field , put
Closedness and flatness of give right balance and . On the free Lie module with
basis , from the proof of Theorem 4.1, these are precisely the operators and . The
characteristic identity reduces the remaining on the right. The path
preserves flatness, as its logarithmic form is . At zero the first two maps are the
Koszul maps for the regular sequence , tensored with . The rank lemma proves the
required lower bound, including irreducible multiplicities in the equivariant case.
We first establish the upper bound for just the operators in variables, assuming
invertibility of every with . The characteristic identity in the variables gives
For the divided differences, this follows by subtracting the two identities with
numerators and ; the right side is before division. Thus every multiple of is hit.
The divided differences contain intermediate powers of the coordinate being deleted. To
isolate their constant term in that coordinate, filter by , and refine each successive layer
by the powers , , in decreasing order. In the associated layer, terms that raise the exponent
of disappear. The remaining divided difference is , regardless of . Hence deletion fuses
with the natural interpretation if , and retains the other braid residues. Flatness is
preserved. Indeed, the coefficients of , for , in are regular at a generic point of . Their
restrictions are exactly the curvature coefficients of the fused form; they vanish. This
proves the rational identity on the whole smaller arrangement. The scalar shifts do not
change it. Closedness is automatic. For every remaining subset , fusion changes its only by
, so all nonresonance conditions are inherited.
Induction and right exactness give
The same induction provides the monomials as a spanning set. This proves the needed
upper bound for the smaller layers.
For the theorem itself, the full-subset hypothesis makes the image of exactly . Apply
the thick coordinate filtration with exponent , refining the -th layer by , , as above. Since ,
the -th coordinate-derivative term vanishes in every such layer. Fusion is unchanged, while
the central shift in (4.7) is now instead of . Each remaining layer meets the
just-proved hypotheses by the proper-subset assumptions of the theorem. Therefore
The lifted spanning monomials are exactly those stated in Theorem 4.1. The
lower bounds make them independent and prove the representation statement.
□
5. Filtered logarithmic operators
When a flat differential perturbation has lower degree than the multiplication part, a
regular sequence gives normal forms at every parameter. The same argument works with
scalar, matrix, or noncommutative coefficients.
Let be a field, let have positive integer weights, and let be free over , graded, and
closed under Lie brackets. Choose a homogeneous basis , with . A -linear map is closed if
Suppose is homogeneous of degree and form a regular sequence of positive degrees .
Write , and fix a graded vector-space complement to in . The principal example will be
for a homogeneous potential .
Theorem 5.1 (Filtered normal forms).Let be a unital associative -algebra, let be
central, and let be -linear and homogeneous of degree zero. Assume
For left multiplication by , define
Then inclusion induces a filtered isomorphism of right -modules
The hit subspace is independent of the basis of , its associated graded space is , and the
finite Lie–Rinehart complex is exact in positive degrees. For every left -module , the
same assertions hold with coefficient space ; in particular the quotient is . All
identifications are equivariant for compatible finite-group actions when is chosen
stable.
Proof.Closedness, the divergence identity, and (5.1) give
Thus defines a right action for the bracket and anchor of scaled by . Use the finite
exterior differential of (3.3), with first map . Give an exterior basis vector filtration shift ,
and give the coefficient algebra degree zero. The leading complex is the Koszul complex of
, tensored over with . Indeed, the other action terms lower shifted degree by , and so do
the bracket terms, since in .
The remaining issue is cancellation between leading multipliers; such a cancellation
might otherwise create a new leading term outside . Regularity makes each cancellation a
Koszul boundary, and the flat differential lifts that boundary without changing the
image. Here is the degree reduction explicitly. For , suppose the highest shifted
degree of exceeds . Its leading part is a Koszul cycle, hence a Koszul boundary.
Subtracting the corresponding lifted boundary leaves unchanged and lowers that
degree. Iteration terminates, so the leading part of lies in . Conversely, every
homogeneous element of this space is the leading part of an image. Therefore
The decomposition now gives, by degree reduction,
This proves (5.2), including its filtration assertion. For a positive-degree cycle, its
leading part is again a Koszul boundary; subtracting a lift and descending in degree proves
exactness.
Every step remains valid with coefficients in an arbitrary ; the scalar Koszul complex is
exact after tensoring with any -vector space. The balanced identity in (5.3) gives basis
independence. For a stable complement, inclusion makes the identifications equivariant.
□
The proof requires only strict degree decrease of the lower terms. It therefore applies
unchanged when these terms have several different degrees, provided the identities (5.3)
still hold.
Corollary 5.2 (Scalar parameters).Let , , and suppose form a regular sequence
of positive degrees. Let be closed -linear maps of degree zero. For every choice of
parameters,
has a joint-image quotient with basis space , filtered associated graded space , and
an exact finite exterior complex in positive degrees. Over , the quotient is freely ,
and this identification survives every specialization. Giving the parameters degree makes it graded. If a finite group preserves , and the cocycles, a stable gives the same
conclusions equivariantly.
Proof.Take , , and in the theorem. □
For matrix coefficients, retain from the preceding corollary. Let be any commutative
-algebra, a finite free -module, and . Suppose and the degree-zero -linear map satisfies
For , inclusion gives
Apply Theorem 5.1 to and its left module . The isomorphism is filtered with
associated graded , and the finite exterior complex is exact in positive degrees.
All assertions commute with arbitrary base change and are equivariant when
the data and the complement are preserved. In particular, a homogeneous flat
connection gives . Its flatness equation implies (5.4); separate closedness of is
unnecessary.
A stable graded complement exists by averaging when the group order is invertible in
.
Flatness cannot be omitted. On , the operators and have regular leading multipliers ,
but . Thus is hit for every , and the quotient is zero.
5.1. Free arrangements and scalar residues.
For the geometric applications, take . Let be a central arrangement in , choose a linear
equation for every , and let
Assume that is free, so this module has a homogeneous basis . It is closed under
brackets. If its usual arrangement exponents are , then the anchor degrees used above are
.
Call a homogeneous polynomial admissible if its restriction to each intersection flat of
has no critical point outside the origin. For every degree , admissible polynomials form a
nonempty Zariski open subset of ; restriction to a fixed flat is surjective, a general degree-
form on that flat has a smooth projective zero locus, and there are only finitely many
flats.
The regular-sequence consequence can be proved directly. At a point , let be the
intersection of the hyperplanes containing . The values at of logarithmic derivations
span exactly . Containment follows from tangency. For the reverse inclusion,
if , then the constant vector field in direction , multiplied by , is logarithmic
and takes a nonzero scalar multiple of at . Thus the common zero locus of all
is the origin when is admissible. These polynomials therefore form a regular
sequence.
The maps
are polynomial, -linear, homogeneous Lie cocycles of degree zero. Corollary 5.2consequently applies to
with every and every collection . Its associated graded quotient is the Solomon–Terao
complete intersection ; this terminology follows [7]. In particular, for ordinary polynomial
degree,
There are no parameter exclusions.
The same conclusion holds for any free multiarrangement with positive integer
multiplicities , replacing by . This module is closed under brackets; if and , the terms
of order cancel in . The evaluation argument uses instead, and is otherwise
unchanged.
Reflection groups.
For every finite complex reflection group, its reflection arrangement is free by Terao’s
theorem [8, Theorem 2]. Hence (5.6)–(5.7) provide a family for every such group. If is
group-invariant and the weights are constant on hyperplane orbits, every assertion is
equivariant. Such an invariant admissible potential always exists in sufficiently large
degree. For example, the invariant forms of degree have no projective base point;
for a nonzero , choose a linear form nonzero on its finite -orbit and square the
product of all its -translates. The resulting invariant form does not vanish at .
Restricting this base-point-free linear system to each projective flat and applying
Bertini’s theorem gives a general invariant admissible potential. Zero-dimensional
projective flats are handled by choosing a form nonzero at the corresponding
point.
For a general complex reflection group the comparison algebra here is the displayed
Solomon–Terao complete intersection, with degrees . The following specialization gives
ordinary coinvariants for every finite real reflection group.
Corollary 5.3.Let be a finite real reflection group acting on the complexification
of its real reflection representation. Choose orthonormal coordinates and basic
homogeneous invariants , with , and put
For every and arbitrary logarithmic weights , the joint-image quotient of the
operators
has associated graded vector space equal to the ordinary coinvariant algebra . Every
fixed graded complement representing is a basis space for the quotient at all these
parameters. If the weights are constant on hyperplane orbits, this is an isomorphism
of filtered -modules. The universal quotient is free over the polynomial ring in all the
displayed parameters.
Proof.The gradient fields are logarithmic because reflection invariance of makes
its derivative normal to a reflecting hyperplane vanish on that hyperplane. Their
coefficient determinant is a nonzero constant times , by the basic-invariant Jacobian
formula for real reflection groups. They therefore form a basis of ; in Cramer’s rule for
any logarithmic field, each numerator determinant vanishes on every , so is divisible
by the same squarefree product. Finally, by Euler’s identity. Corollary 5.2 applies
to the regular sequence of basic invariants. □
5.2. Matrix and universal residues.
For a free central arrangement , choose matrices , one for each hyperplane. Suppose
that for every codimension-two intersection flat ,
Then
is polynomial on , separately closed, and satisfies . Consequently (5.4) holds for every ,
independently of the matrices’ eigenvalues or Jordan forms. The quotient in (5.5) is
therefore a simultaneous free family over the coordinate ring defined by the matrix
relations (5.8), together with the independent parameter .
Here is an elementary verification of the curvature assertion. The rational matrix-valued
one-form is closed. Group the terms in according to the codimension-two flat . The group
for is the square of the logarithmic form for the hyperplanes containing , regarded on the
two-dimensional quotient by . If is its radial Euler field, contraction of that square is
by (5.8). A rational two-form on a two-dimensional vector space with zero contraction
by its nonzero radial field is zero. Every group of terms therefore vanishes. Restriction to
logarithmic vector fields proves the assertion about .
For a finite real reflection group and a representation , a particularly natural choice is
where is reflection in and is constant on -orbits of hyperplanes. These matrices satisfy
(5.8); in the rank-two parabolic subgroup fixing , the sum of the weighted reflections is
central, since its coefficients are constant on conjugacy classes. With the quadratic
potential and gradient basis of Corollary 5.3, the associated graded quotient is
with the diagonal -action, for every value of and the orbit parameters . More generally,
arbitrary residues satisfying (5.8) give the same vector-space conclusion for every free
arrangement, without a semisimplicity assumption.
The residue construction also works for every finite complex reflection group. Let be its
set of reflections, choose parameters constant on -conjugacy classes, and set
For a codimension-two flat , the sum of the with is a scalar minus a conjugation-invariant
weighted sum of reflections in the pointwise stabilizer . It is therefore central in the image
of , while each of these belongs to that image. Thus (5.8) holds. Using a -invariant
admissible potential as in Section 5.1 gives the equivariant associated graded quotient
for all parameters. For real reflection groups the quadratic potential specializes this
statement to the ordinary coinvariant algebra.
The universal residue algebra.
For a free central arrangement, an explicit universal algebra is
where the coefficient is central. Define
The rank-two curvature calculation above is valid with values in any associative
algebra. It proves and , hence (5.1). For every admissible potential, the resulting quotient
is therefore free over , with any homogeneous Solomon–Terao basis as a right-module
basis. Every representation of , including nonsemisimple and infinite-dimensional
ones, inherits the same normal forms and positive-degree acyclicity. For a real
reflection arrangement with the quadratic potential, the universal right-module basis
can be any homogeneous basis representing . The construction is equivariant
under arrangement symmetries acting on the algebra by permuting the generators
.
5.3. Connections in the potential parameters.
The uniform normal forms also carry an explicit flat connection. This construction gives
a parameter family of finite-dimensional connections for every free arrangement, with no
additional nonresonance conditions on its residues.
Retain and the regular sequence from Corollary 5.2, and write . Let be a unital
associative complex algebra. Fix a homogeneous flat -connection
where acts on the left, is -linear in , and has the anchor degree of . Flatness means
Choose homogeneous polynomials of degrees strictly smaller than , allowing constants,
and introduce central parameters . Put
Differentiating in changes by . Commuting multiplication by past its differential part
produces the opposite term. This determines the connection in the direction. In the
direction, preservation of the joint image allows the commutator to be , which leads to the
second operator below.
Theorem 5.4.Let be a fixed graded complement to . The quotient by the joint
images of is naturally a free right -module with basis any complex basis of . Its finite
exterior complex is exact in positive homological degrees, over the parameter algebra
and after every coefficient-module specialization.
After inverting , the operators
descend to the quotient. They are mutually commuting connections in the displayed
parameter directions. In the fixed normal-form basis, their matrices have coefficients in .
At , the -connection matrices have poles of order at most one, and the -connection matrix
has a pole of order at most two. There are no poles at other finite parameter
values.
Proof.The leading polynomial-degree part of is still multiplication by . The extra
terms have strictly smaller degree, as do the connection and divergence terms.
The operators remain right balanced, and their commutators equal , because
and the potential is scalar. The degree-reduction proof of Theorem 5.1 and its
degree-decreasing variant therefore give the free basis and higher exactness.
On the full polynomial module, direct calculation gives
For the second identity, writing , the derivative term is , while the multiplication
commutator contributes . Thus every connection preserves the sum of the images.
Moreover,
This proves flatness on the quotient.
The normal-form projection is right -linear and uses no parameter inverses. Hence
the normal forms of and , for basis elements , have polynomial coefficients in the
parameters. Equation (5.9) gives exactly the asserted pole orders. The algebraic
exactness persists under every coefficient-module specialization. The connection
identities persist under every parameter-independent representation of ; more
generally, one may use coefficient modules equipped with compatible parameter
connections. A parameter derivative is not asserted to descend to a quotient that
fixes that same parameter. □
For the universal residue algebra , use , regarding the residue generators as independent
of the new central parameter . The rank-two relations make this a flat connection. The
theorem then supplies one universal flat parameter connection whose every representation
has the corresponding Solomon–Terao normal forms. For a real reflection group with
quadratic potential, the rank of its finite coefficient specialization is , and the underlying
associated graded module is .
5.4. Constant matrix curvature.
For constant matrix perturbations, flatness can be imposed on a quotient
of the coefficient module. The following elementary observation identifies that
quotient.
Let be a commutative -algebra, let be an -module, and put . All endomorphisms
called constant below are independent of the , but may depend on parameters in
.
Lemma 5.5 (Curvature reduction).Suppose
act on , where the are scalar polynomial derivations, , , and . Assume that
with scalar coefficients and constant endomorphisms . Let be the smallest
submodule stable under all and containing all . If , then . Consequently the quotient
by is the joint-image quotient of the induced operators on .
Proof.The commutator identity puts in . If , then
Iteration gives . Stability under the makes all operators descend, proving the
quotient assertion. □
Theorem 5.6.Give a positive integral grading. Let a finite-dimensional graded Lie
algebra act on , with homogeneous derivation basis and constant structure coefficients
Suppose and homogeneous polynomials , of degrees , form a regular sequence and
satisfy
For arbitrary constant , set
where ranges over all words in , including the empty word. For any homogeneous
vector-space complement to , the quotient map induces a filtered isomorphism
The Chevalley–Eilenberg complex of the induced operators on , with bracket
multiplied by , is exact in positive homological degrees.
Proof.The cocycle identity gives , so Lemma 5.5 reduces the quotient to . The
induced operators satisfy the required Lie relations. Give a basis wedge filtration
shift . Multiplication by preserves total filtration degree; lowers it by , by , and a
nonzero bracket term by . The associated graded differential is the Koszul differential
of the regular sequence , tensored over with . The degree-reduction argument in
Theorem 5.1 now gives positive-degree exactness and the normal-form decomposition
with complement . □
Corollary 5.7.Let have ordinary polynomial degree , and suppose the partial
derivatives of its highest homogeneous part form a regular sequence. For constant
endomorphisms , set
If is a homogeneous complement to the Jacobian ideal of , the joint-image quotient
is , and the induced commuting Koszul complex is exact in positive degrees. In
particular, when is finite dimensional over , its dimension is .
Proof.Since , curvature reduction makes the operators commute on . The Koszul
filtration by polynomial degree plus has leading differential given by the regular
sequence . The degree-reduction argument applies; the complete intersection has
length . □
The module is the largest quotient on which the induced constant operators satisfy
the required Lie relations. Its formation commutes with base change because
it is the cokernel of the map with columns . In finite dimension it is found by
repeatedly adjoining the -images of the initial curvature images. For fixed complex
matrices in the gradient case, is independent of , and the quotient over is free on
.
There is also a universal form. Take , with acting by left multiplication by . Then
and Theorem 5.6 identifies the quotient with the free right -module .
6. Jacobian operators and resonant fibers
The preceding normal forms have no exceptional parameters because their differential
terms lower degree. Jacobian operators instead have terms of equal degree, so resonance
can occur. A single Euler identity isolates the possible resonant degree in both
scalar and vector-valued families; the remaining task is to measure the defect
there.
Let , with positive integer weights , and put and . Let be a graded -module and choose
. Set
For , define
Lemma 6.1 (Euler reduction).One has , with equality unless for some with . At
that parameter, multiplication by identifies with
placed entirely in target degree .
Proof.Since , the inclusion is immediate, and . The identity
kills in the quotient unless . This proves equality away from the stated parameters
and concentration in degree at resonance.
Suppose , with , , and . Put
Then . Subtract the Euler expression ; the differences form an actual syzygy, .
Their divergence recovers , since
Conversely, gives . Since , the kernel is precisely . □
6.1. Hypersurfaces.
Theorem 6.2.Let be nonzero and weighted homogeneous of positive degree . Put
and
If
then . An isolated critical point is not required for this equality.
Proof.Apply Lemma 6.1 with , , , and parameter . Euler’s identity gives , and the
normalized operators are . □
If has an isolated critical point at the origin, its partial derivatives form a regular
sequence, and throughout this range
For ordinary homogeneity of degree , this becomes
The equality of subspaces is automatically equivariant for every finite linear group
preserving .
Under the isolated-critical-point hypothesis, the free Lie module and cocycle also place
this family in Theorem 3.1, since . Euler reduction determines the individual
specializations.
6.2. The exact defect at every exceptional parameter.
Now assume and that has an isolated critical point at the origin. The Euler reduction
leaves the divergence quotient of the fields tangent to . Put
and retain the notation above.
Theorem 6.3.If is not of the form with , then . At , with , one has
More precisely, the quotient is concentrated in weighted degree and is naturally
isomorphic to
The graded -module is free, with a homogeneous basis obtained by lifting any
homogeneous vector-space basis of .
If a finite linear group preserves the weights and , all the natural maps above are
-equivariant. In particular, the exceptional defect, as a -module, is isomorphic to
placed entirely in weighted degree . Terms of negative degree are zero.
Proof.The normalized Euler family above has syzygy module . Since the partial
derivatives form a regular sequence, this module is generated by the Koszul fields ,
whose divergences vanish. Hence
Lemma 6.1, with parameter , identifies the resonant defect with , in polynomial
degree after undoing the target shift.
We prove the claimed freeness directly. Give weight , write for polynomial
differential forms, and identify with after multiplication by the volume form. Under
this identification, the denominator defining is
It is preserved by multiplication by , because . Let . For any homogeneous -form
of form weight , Cartan’s identity gives
Since and the weights are positive, . It follows that
The reverse inclusion uses Euler’s identity for . Thus , with coefficient degrees
unchanged.
Multiplication by on is injective. Indeed, suppose , with a homogeneous top
form of weight . Then
Koszul exactness at gives . Differentiating, and using , gives
This proves injectivity. Lifts of a homogeneous basis of now generate over by
induction on degree. A relation among them reduces modulo to a relation among the
basis of ; its constant coefficients therefore vanish. Injectivity of permits cancellation,
and iteration proves linear independence. Hence
All the maps defining the defect are natural under linear transformations
preserving the grading and . Choose a graded -stable complement to in , which
exists by averaging in each degree. Its image provides equivariant Milnor-basis lifts
in the preceding freeness proof. Since is invariant, this gives as graded -modules,
and therefore (6.2). The natural sequence also splits degree by degree as a -module
sequence. □
For ordinary homogeneity and , this gives an exact exceptional set as well as the size
and character of every defect. If , the polynomial has positive coefficients in every degree
from to , and . Thus every , , produces a nonzero defect. If , then , so a defect occurs
exactly at
and has dimension one, in degree .
In one variable there is a different, elementary answer. Write , with , and give weight .
Then
The quotient equals unless for an integer . At such a parameter it acquires exactly one
additional monomial class, , of weighted degree . This also explains why the hypothesis is
needed for the Brieskorn-module freeness formula above.
The actual weighted exceptional set can be stated without coefficient extraction. Let
be the degrees of a homogeneous Milnor basis, counted with multiplicity, and put
For , the parameters at which the quotient differs from are exactly
At , the defect dimension is the number of pairs with , as read from the homogeneous
basis of .
6.3. Complete intersections.
The Euler argument also applies to a vector-valued family attached to a complete
intersection. The Buchsbaum–Rim complex identifies the divergence quotient with a
Brieskorn module, whose rank is then given by Greuel’s freeness theorem.
Let , with positive integer weights , and write . Let be a weighted homogeneous regular
sequence, of degrees , where . Assume
where is the ideal of maximal minors. Thus the zero fiber is a positive-dimensional
complete intersection with an isolated singularity at the origin. Put
In particular, has degree zero. Define
and the graded subspaces
The map has degree . The baseline is a Jacobian cokernel; it need not be finite
dimensional.
Theorem 6.4.For every , one has , with equality if
At , the defect is concentrated in degree , and its dimension is
Consequently,
More precisely, there is a canonical identification of the defect with the degree-part of
The subspace is stable under multiplication by each , and is a free -module on
homogeneous lifts of a basis of .
If a finite group acts linearly, preserves the weights, and fixes each , then the
defect, with its entire underlying space placed in degree , is isomorphic as a -module
to
The natural sequence with quotient splits as a graded -module sequence.
Proof.Weighted Euler gives , and the syzygy module is exactly . Lemma 6.1
therefore gives the nonresonant equality and identifies every resonant defect with .
Since for , this quotient is a module over .
We next identify and compute this module. Set
We claim that multiplication by the volume form identifies with . Here and below
denotes polynomial differential forms.
To justify the syzygy assertion needed for this claim, let . The positive grading
and the finite-dimensionality of imply, by induction on degree, that is finite over the
subalgebra generated by the . Thus is finite. On each reduced irreducible component
of , the differential of has rank at most ; in characteristic zero its image therefore
has dimension at most . Finiteness gives , and consequently
The Buchsbaum–Rim exactness theorem [5, Corollary 2.6] now says that is
generated by the alternating maximal-minor vectors associated to the -element
subsets of the columns. For each associated vector field , its contraction with the
volume form is, up to sign, , where is a constant coordinate -form. These vector
fields have zero divergence, since . It follows that
In particular, this identity concerns the image of the divergence map as a vector
subspace, without taking an ideal closure.
The quotient by the base parameters is elementary. Give weight . For a
homogeneous -form of form weight , Cartan’s identity implies
Since , . Every term of is a multiple of some , by weighted homogeneity. Since , this
proves
Hence, with coefficient degrees unchanged, . Homogeneous lifts of a basis of generate
over by induction on weighted degree.
For independence of these lifts, we use Greuel’s freeness theorem [6, Proposition 4.8,
p. 261]. In the present smooth ambient space and positive fiber dimension it states that
the analytic Brieskorn module
is a finite free module over , with acting by . The assumptions hold because the zero
fiber is an isolated complete intersection singularity and the ambient space is smooth. The
same Euler homotopy proves (6.3) for convergent forms; division of a homogeneous
component by its positive form weight preserves convergence near the origin. Its fiber is
therefore ; a finite-colength polynomial quotient agrees with its analytic version, since a
sufficiently high power of the maximal ideal is already zero. Nakayama’s lemma
and analytic freeness show that the chosen homogeneous lifts form an analytic
basis.
Any polynomial relation among the same lifts in would be an analytic relation among
that basis. Its coefficients must vanish as germs in the independent base variables , and
hence as polynomials. The lifts are therefore independent over . This proves polynomial
freeness and the Hilbert-series formula.
Finally, the coefficient-space constructions, including divergence, are equivariant for a
linear group fixing the . Choose a graded -stable complement representing . Its lifts
provide an equivariant free basis in the preceding argument, and each is -invariant. Thus
as graded -modules. The natural sequence
splits degree by degree by averaging. □
If are the degrees of a homogeneous basis of , counted with multiplicity, then the actual
exceptional parameters are exactly
At , the defect dimension is the number of pairs with . For , multiplying the operators
by , replacing the parameter by , and undoing the target grading shift recovers
Theorem 6.3.
The remaining codimension has a simpler answer and does not require a
singularity-theoretic input.
Proposition 6.5.Let be a weighted homogeneous regular sequence of positive
degrees, and use the same normalized operators and target grading as above. Then except at the parameters
At such a parameter the defect is canonically , placed in target degree . In
particular,
For a finite linear group preserving the weights and every , this is also the exact
-module defect.
Proof.The regular sequence has finite-dimensional quotient, so is finite over .
Dimension therefore forces the to be algebraically independent. In characteristic
zero their Jacobian determinant is nonzero, and consequently . Lemma 6.1 applies
without and gives the asserted defect . □
References
[1]
F. Hivert and N. M. Thiéry, Deformation of symmetric functions and the rational Steenrod
algebra, in Invariant Theory in All Characteristics, CRM Proceedings and Lecture Notes 35
(2004), 91–125. arXiv 0812.3056.
[2]
M. D’Adderio and L. Moci, On a conjecture of Hivert and Thiéry about Steenrod operators, J.
Algebra 354 (2012), 158–179. arXiv 1010.4985.
V. Dotsenko, Twisted logarithmic de Rham complexes and the rational hit conjecture, 19
October 2026. arXiv 2610.26028.
[5]
D. A. Buchsbaum and D. S. Rim, A generalized Koszul complex. II. Depth and multiplicity,
Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 111 (1964), 197–224. DOI 10.1090/S0002-9947-1964-0159860-7.
[6]
G.-M. Greuel, Der Gauß-Manin-Zusammenhang isolierter Singularitäten von vollständigen
Durchschnitten, Math. Ann. 214 (1975), 235–266. DOI 10.1007/BF01352108.
[7]
T. Abe, T. Maeno, S. Murai and Y. Numata, Solomon–Terao algebra of hyperplane
arrangements, J. Math. Soc. Japan 71 (2019), no. 4, 1027–1047. DOI 10.2969/jmsj/79957995.
[8]
H. Terao, Free arrangements of hyperplanes and unitary reflection groups, Proc. Japan Acad.
Ser. A Math. Sci. 56 (1980), no. 8, 389–392. DOI 10.3792/pjaa.56.389.
[9]
L. V. Goncharova, The cohomologies of Lie algebras of formal vector fields on the line, Funct.
Anal. Appl. 7 (1973), no. 2, 91–97; and Cohomologies of Lie algebras of formal vector fields on
the straight line, ibid., no. 3, 194–203. DOI 10.1007/BF01078879; DOI 10.1007/BF01080696.
[10]
D. V. Millionshchikov, Algebra of formal vector fields on the line and Buchstaber’s conjecture,
Funct. Anal. Appl. 43 (2009), no. 4, 264–278. arXiv 0807.0653; DOI 10.1007/s10688-009-0035-9.