Ellipsoids are determined
by their intrinsic volumes
1. Introduction
The intrinsic volumes of a convex body
They include volume, half the surface area, and a multiple of mean width. Gusakova and Zaporozhets conjectured that, within the class of ellipsoids, these quantities determine the body up to a rigid motion [4]. Petrov and Tarasov proved the conjecture in dimension three; Myroshnychenko, Tatarko, and Yaskin subsequently established the corresponding reconstruction theorem for dual volumes in every dimension [3]. We prove the intrinsic-volume conjecture in all dimensions.
The proof uses the one-dimensional integral formula for ellipsoidal intrinsic volumes obtained by Gusakova, Spodarev, and Zaporozhets [2]. Its useful variables are the elementary symmetric functions of the squared semiaxes. In these variables the formula extends beyond ellipsoids to every polynomial with positive coefficients and fixed constant and leading terms. This extension removes the real-rootedness constraint, leaving a rectangular domain on which a global univalence theorem applies.
The essential point is positivity of the coefficient Jacobian. After a positive diagonal rescaling, its symmetric part splits into moment matrices indexed by the coefficients of the polynomial. Each such matrix has a Gram representation, built from the stochastic ordering of power-tilted measures. The constant coefficient alone supplies strict positivity in every direction. Thus the argument remains nonsingular when semiaxes coincide, although recovering the individual semiaxes from the coefficients necessarily loses regularity.
That distinction leads to a quantitative form of reconstruction. Write
for the distance between the unordered semiaxis lists.
Theorem 1.2. For
If
We first express the intrinsic volumes in coefficient coordinates, then prove the moment-kernel positivity and apply it to the Jacobian. The final section extracts coefficient bounds and the stability theorem from the same map.
2. The coefficient transform
Let
The formula of [2, Theorem 1] reads
The hat denotes an omitted variable. The sum in this integrand can be written using
only the head
To verify the identity, put
Induction therefore yields
and
For a general coefficient vector define
Equations (2) and (3) show that
Thus the top intrinsic volume already determines the leading coefficient, while the remaining volumes are the values of the transform with that coefficient fixed.
The advantage of (4) is that it makes sense without real roots. Fix
Every summand is nonnegative and integrable; its power at zero is at least
is bounded and small negative coefficient perturbations consequently preserve a fixed
positive lower bound for
We shall prove the following analytic statement, including its boundary and properness assertions.
Theorem 2.1. For fixed
is injective on
It is therefore a proper smooth embedding, as a manifold with corners, onto a closed image.
3. An ordered moment kernel
The positivity needed for the Jacobian is a property of moments of a positive measure. The measure below need not have finite total mass; only the specified moments will enter the argument.
Lemma 3.1. Let
is positive definite.
Proof. Normalize the power tilts to probability measures,
Increasing the exponent moves mass to the right, so
Indeed, for
The moment assumptions justify both products of integrals.
This ordering makes the mixed moment in (8) a Gram entry. On
For
In particular, the functions are square-integrable and
One further Gram matrix supplies strict positivity. Put
Its Gram functions
where
Positive diagonal congruence now proves
4. Positivity of the coefficient Jacobian
Fix the endpoint coefficients and write
Proof. When
The remaining numerator is
When
leaves
Finally,
which proves the diagonal assertion. □
Introduce the finite positive Mellin moments
and set
Proposition 4.2. The symmetric part
Proof. Use
The matrix
On the right, write
This is the kernel of Lemma 3.1 for the measure
The right block is therefore positive definite whenever nonempty. On the left, reverse
the indices and write
the same kernel for the reciprocal pushforward of
Every
Proof of injectivity in Theorem 2.1. A real matrix is a
These matrices are nonsingular throughout the path, hence their determinants
retain the positive sign of the identity. As
The Gale–Nikaido theorem [1, Theorem 4 and Remark 4.3] states that a
differentiable map on a rectangle is injective if its Jacobian is a
Proof of Theorem 1.1. The case
are therefore identical. Their roots, with multiplicities, are the negative reciprocal squared semiaxes, so the unordered semiaxis lists agree. □
5. Bounds and stability of reconstruction
The coefficient map remains regular at repeated semiaxes. We first give a bound that makes its properness explicit, then separate its smooth inversion from the root-matching step where the Hölder exponent appears.
5.1. A coefficient box from the intrinsic volumes. Fix
where
Because both endpoint coefficients are positive,
For the second equality, integrate
on finite intervals. The lower boundary tends to zero, while the upper boundary differs
from
This completes Theorem 2.1. Indeed, the coefficient bound makes preimages of compact sets bounded; continuity makes them closed, hence compact. Injectivity and the nonsingular Jacobian give a smooth local inverse, including across each boundary face, and properness makes the image closed.
For ellipsoids, AM–GM applied to the
5.2. Smooth recovery of coefficients. Allow
This is a smooth injective map on
For
If all semiaxes lie in
Choose
with
5.3. Root matching and the optimal exponent. We record the root-matching
estimate with multiplicities. Let
To see this, put
since
Apply (17) to the monic polynomials with roots
For optimality, choose a monic degree-
Their monic root polynomials are
which differ only in their constant term, by
When
References
- [1]
- D. Gale and H. Nikaido, The Jacobian matrix and global univalence of mappings, Math. Ann. 159 (1965), 81–93.
- [2]
- A. Gusakova, E. Spodarev, and D. Zaporozhets, Intrinsic volumes of ellipsoids, Zap. Nauchn. Sem. S.-Peterburg. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov. (POMI) 515 (2022), 121–140; arXiv 2206.14002.
- [3]
- S. Myroshnychenko, K. Tatarko, and V. Yaskin, Unique determination of ellipsoids by their dual volumes, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2022 (2022), no. 17, 13569–13589; DOI 10.1093/imrn/rnab111.
- [4]
- F. Petrov and A. Tarasov, Uniqueness of a three-dimensional ellipsoid with given intrinsic volumes, Arnold Math. J. 6 (2020), 163–171; DOI 10.1007/s40598-020-00137-9.